Within days of taking office, the president issued executive orders targeting mass deportations and dismantling Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs across federal and state institutions.

Directed Algorithms prioritize controversy, outrage, and sensationalism, creating echo chambers that stifle unity and action. In 2023, a study by the Pew Research Center found that 70% of social media users felt their online behavior was being manipulated by algorithms.

The slow build of this administration’s empire began long before the election, through systemic infiltration of institutions and deliberate exclusion of melanated individuals from positions of power. The infiltration of white supremacy into the digital age is neither new nor accidental. When did this begin? Was it inevitable? Is this the new and Final intention of the New World?

A.I. and the direction of Media Content started long before social media, in the earliest iterations of the internet, where algorithms were built by predominantly white developers, reflecting their implicit biases. By the 2010s, as artificial intelligence (AI) gained traction, its applications became tools to amplify and sustain racial hierarchies. Facial recognition systems misidentify Black faces at rates 5 to 10 times higher than white ones. Since the election, this effort has accelerated, with key melanated officials quietly removed from office. Legislative proposals tied to mass deportation policies disproportionately target melanated immigrant communities, while political appointments favor individuals who actively oppose DEI principles and racial equity.

From The Digital C/age: Supremacy of A.I., Within days of taking office, the president issued executive orders targeting mass deportations and dismantling Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs across federal and state institutions. DEI, designed to create equitable opportunities for historically excluded groups, focuses on fostering diversity in workplaces, ensuring equity in decision-making, and promoting inclusion to bridge systemic inequalities.

Removing social programs like DEI, Social Security, and ending American birthright citizenship policies disproportionately affects melanated individuals, limiting their ability and access to generational wealth, leadership positions, economic and community advancement. For melanated people nationwide, the absence of DEI means fewer protections against systemic racism and fewer opportunities to thrive in spaces already dominated by whiteness.

The dismantling of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs across institutions has created a ripple effect, disproportionately harming melanated communities. DEI initiatives were designed to address systemic inequities, foster inclusive environments, and ensure accountability within organizations. However, recent 2025 political and cultural shifts in quick legislation have led to the erosion of these critical programs, leaving marginalized groups questioning the iminent discrimination and exclusion.

In 2024, the newly elected U.S. administration issued executive orders targeting the dismantling of DEI programs across federal and state institutions. This move was framed as promoting “merit-based” systems, but the impact has been severe. A 2024 report by the Brookings Institution revealed that over 60% of Fortune 500 companies scaled back their DEI initiatives following political pressure, resulting in a noticeable decline in workplace diversity and inclusion efforts. Melanated employees, who already face systemic barriers to advancement, are now left without the support systems that once helped level the playing field.

The removal of DEI programs eliminates mechanisms that hold organizations accountable for discriminatory practices. For example, a 2023 study by the Harvard Business Review found that companies with active DEI programs were 45% more likely to report improved employee satisfaction and 30% more likely to outperform their peers in profitability. The consequences extend beyond the workplace. In education, the push for school vouchers and private schooling has gained momentum, particularly in states like Texas, where lawmakers recently voted to implement a statewide voucher program. These policies divert public funding away from public schools and toward private institutions, which often lack the same accountability measures as public schools. A 2024 report by the National Education Association (NEA) found that states with active voucher programs saw a 20% increase in racial segregation in schools, as private institutions are not required to adhere to the same anti-discrimination policies as public schools.

In Texas, the push for school vouchers has been particularly aggressive. Proponents argue that vouchers give families more “choice,” but critics point out that this choice often excludes low-income and melanated families. Private schools, which are the primary beneficiaries of voucher programs, frequently have tuition costs that far exceed the voucher amount, making them inaccessible to many. Additionally, private schools are not required to provide the same level of support for students with disabilities or those who require English language learning resources, further marginalizing vulnerable populations.

The impact on public schools is devastating. As funding is siphoned away, public schools in underserved communities face budget cuts, teacher shortages, and deteriorating infrastructure. A 2024 study by the Education Trust found that 70% of public schools in Texas reported a decline in resources following the introduction of voucher programs, with schools in predominantly Black and Brown neighborhoods being hit the hardest. This creates a two-tiered education system where wealthier families can access better resources, while low-income and melanated students are left behind.

The dismantling of DEI programs and the push for school vouchers are part of a broader trend that prioritizes profit and privilege over equity and inclusion.

These swift policies dispel a silent Warning:

The Time to act is Now.

 This newly acquired, Presidential tech-power structure operates without transparency and accountability, concealing its ownership and influence until moments of quick decisive action. It mirrors the president’s own behavioral approach and general stance: Maintaining the appearance of neutrality while building systems designed to perpetuate and further white dominance. Once fully operational, these platforms and policies will work in tandem to control public narratives, remove public opinion, erase melanated visibility, and solidify power structures that favor harmful White ideals.

The combination of political power and tech dominance has created an unapologetic system where white supremacy is not only normalized and praised but also enforced through data manipulation, media narratives, and legislative actions.

READ MORE in The Digital C/age : W/ Supremacy of Artificial Intelligence by KuroKingdom Books